Author: Ross Boylan Date: To: dmo-discussion CC: RossBoylan Subject: Re: build-dep warning for myth 0.25
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 10:36 +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > Ross Boylan <RossBoylan@???> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > Does anyone know what to make of the message about unsatisfied
> > dependency for libsdl-dev? Notice libsdl1.2-dev is among the list of
> > packages to be installed. Is the latter just missing a provides:?
>
> libsdl-dev is a virtual package. Later in the list of all package you
> can seee libsdl1.2-dev
>
> Christian So why the complaint about unsatisfied dependencies? Is the conclusion
that a) everything needed for the build will be there and b) I should
file a bug against libsdl1.2-dev that it needs to indicate satisfies the
virtual package (which I was guessing is a provides relationship)?
